Wednesday, July 29, 2015

My meeting was a disaster!

(It's been a long time since I last wrote. Thanks to all of you who wrote in or spoke to me and mentioned that you would like me to continue posting. I am back, and I sure hope to be regular)


Twice, in the recent past, I have had candidates meeting with some senior executives from the hiring company and telling me that the interaction was a disaster.


And how could they tell?


There were the obvious clues :
  • the chemistry was just not there
  • it seemed like they had already made up their mind with someone else for the role
  • the meeting was scheduled for an hour, but they wrapped it up well before that
  • the company executive was focusing on gaps rather than trying to understand the things I have done
These are usually clear indicators that you are not making the cut for the role.
So what does one do when this happens?

Usually there's not much one can do. But there are some things you could.
  • Chemistry, or the lack of it, is one of the primary reasons why company executives reject candidates. But they won't tell you that. Feedback shared, if any, will usually be about how they liked you but found someone who fit the bill better!
    But the thing about chemistry is that it is a 'two way street'. The onus on making the chemistry work, rests as much upon you, as it does on the interviewer.
    More often than not, our personal biases, insecurities and fears come into play.
    The key, I think, is to be aware of this; to acknowledge the importance of 'chemistry' and trying to mentally prepare yourself before the meeting so that you are in a positive frame of mind. I know its easier said than done!
  • Be prepared : Preparation and professionalism shows, and it helps win over tough interviewers. Very often, the hiring manager/ interviewer gets turned off if they feel that the candidate is not well-prepared and doesn't seem to be serious about the opportunity or committed to the process.
  • Ask for feedback! You could ask the consultant who positioned you as a candidate, or you could ask your contacts in the company. But be graceful about the feedback, even though you might be convinced that the company executive has got you all wrong and you haven't got a chance to defend yourself.
  • Sometimes, the interviewer is only one among multiple individuals who are meeting you, and your meetings with all the other company executives go exceedingly well enough to counter the one bad interview you had.
  • Give it time! Sometimes the company comes back for one more round of discussions.
The best way to look at this situation is that, if the chemistry didn't work out even during the courting stage, then you possibly wouldn't want to risk working with this manager! Maybe there is a better match for you out there somewhere.


Of the two people who spoke to me about their disastrous meetings, one heard back from the company, because all the other executives who had met him were very impressed with him and were keen to get him on board.

7 comments:

  1. Guru,

    I wish to differ on the Chemistry aspect. Chemistry is not just a positive frame of mind as every candidate, unless he is forced by the Head Hunter :), attends an interview with the objective of being successful. It is a different matter he decides to accept or not. I believe that the candidate has to be his own self in the interview and not fake a false chemistry, only to repent later. If it turns out to be a disastrous meeting, so be it. Both parties avoid having an unhappy party in the long run... opportunities are unlimited; fitment is more important. Love your comments...........

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Ravishankar, completely agree on the point that its better for both parties to accept that its not working out and move on, rather than force the chemistry and then repent in leisure!

      Delete
  2. Good stuff. I recall one meeting way way back when I got slightly needled with the tone and approach of questions ( head vsat sales) and ended up taking a mildly confrontational mode as well instead of kow towing. I walked away very clear that I didn't want to work with him anyways :)
    Not offering this as advice in interviewing strategy , it just happened spontaneously but its good to walk out of such a situation without thinking too much about it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If you're going to be walking out, better to walk out with your head held high! :)

      Delete
  3. Guru
    Some researchers claim that interview outcomes get " decided" in the first few minutes , based on " chemistry" as you have written.
    This is why companies have multiple interviews , and that's where your suggestion of not getting devastated about one interaction going wrong makes a lot of sense.
    Keep posting.
    Aditya

    ReplyDelete
  4. Some times it is best to have the bad chemistry or other reasons come out in the initial stages itself. Just imagine, you join, announce the transition, and months later wonder what drove you to join a job from hell! or a boss from the same place. Maybe it is you, maybe it is the boss, but you are stuck.

    I had a very high level interaction with a leading CEO, and every few minutes he tended to warn me that he could call one of my old bosses to cross-check. That made up my mind: my CV showed industry leading performance awards which were celebrated by the very person he threatened to check with! and I had enough and decided the interview was more about his ego than my fit into the organization.

    Not always is it about you... sometimes it is about them and their foibles.

    ReplyDelete